Position Sizing: Turning 1R into a Concrete Position Size
In risk-reward,
we defined 1R (max loss per trade).
- Account: 10,000 USD
- Max loss per trade: 1% of account
1R = 100 USD
In this article, we’ll turn that 1R into:
“So how many units should I actually buy or sell?”
—in other words,
a concrete position size.
1. Why position size matters so much
Consider two traders with:
- the same 10,000 USD account,
- similar entries and stop placements.
But:
- Trader A risks 1% of the account per trade (1R),
- Trader B risks 5% per trade.
Even with the same strategy:
- B can lose 20%+ of the account
after just 4–5 losing trades in a row, - while A can stay in the game much longer.
So even with the same setup:
Position size is often
the main difference between surviving and blowing up.
That’s why professional traders don’t decide size by feel:
Instead they use a routine:
“Given my 1R (max loss), and the distance to my stop,
what position size fits inside that?”
2. The basic pieces: account, 1R, stop distance
Position sizing uses three main inputs:
-
Account size
- The capital you’re trading with (e.g., 10,000 USD).
-
Risk per trade (Risk %)
- e.g. 1%, 0.5%, etc.
- This is 1R from risk-reward.
-
Price distance between entry and stop
- For a long: entry price − stop price
- For a short: stop price − entry price
- Think of it as a positive number for easier math.
From these, the core formula is:
Position size = (Account × Risk %) ÷ (Stop distance)
Let’s start with a spot (non-leveraged) example.
3. Spot example: calculating position size
Example setup:
- Account: 10,000 USD
- Risk per trade: 1% (→ 1R = 100 USD)
- Instrument: BTC
- Long entry: 20,000 USD
- Stop: 19,800 USD
3-1. Stop distance
For a long:
- Stop distance = entry − stop
So:
- 20,000 − 19,800 = 200 USD
Holding 1 BTC:
- if price hits the stop,
you lose 200 USD.
3-2. Position size
We only want to lose 1R = 100 USD if stopped out.
Position size = (Allowed loss) ÷ (Loss per 1 BTC)
- Allowed loss = 100 USD
- Loss per 1 BTC = 200 USD
→ Position size = 100 ÷ 200 = 0.5 BTC
This way:
- Stop hit → loss = 200 × 0.5 = 100 USD = −1R
- Targets can then be set at +2R, +3R, etc.,
as in risk-reward.
4. Position sizing with leverage and futures
Leverage in futures and margin trading
often creates confusion.
The key idea is simple:
Leverage can reduce the margin required,
but it does not change your 1R
(your allowed loss per trade).
In the example above, for 0.5 BTC:
- Required margin depends on leverage,
- but the stop still means
200 USD × 0.5 = 100 USD loss.
So:
- Calculate position size exactly the same way,
ignoring leverage at first. - Then think of leverage only as:
- “How much margin do I need
to hold this position size?”
- “How much margin do I need
Leverage is not a tool to make positions bigger;
it’s a tool to hold the same size
with less locked-up capital.
(Leverage risk itself will be revisited in
max-loss
and drawdown.)
5. Same formula across markets and currencies
Crypto, FX, stocks, different quote currencies—
the numbers change, but the structure does not.
- Define 1R (allowed loss) from your account.
- For the instrument you’re trading, compute:
- entry price,
- stop price,
- and any needed FX conversion,
- to get loss per 1 unit.
- Then:
Position size = 1R ÷ loss per 1 unit
In atr-sizing
we’ll replace “stop distance”
with an ATR-based risk measure
for more automated sizing,
but the core logic stays the same.
6. Common position sizing mistakes
6-1. Choosing size first, then forcing a stop
Very common pattern:
- “I’ll just trade 1 BTC this time,”
- “I usually trade 0.1 BTC,
so I’ll do that again.”
Here, you fix the size first,
and only later think about the stop.
Then:
- if the stop is wide,
- your account risk in R becomes larger,
- and your 1R rule
from risk-reward
quietly breaks.
A healthier habit is:
- Decide 1R from account
- Choose entry and stop based on the chart
- Let the math decide size
6-2. Moving the stop to fit a desired size
The opposite mistake:
- “I really want to hold 0.5 BTC,”
- “If I reduce size,
profits will look too small.”
So you:
- push the stop closer to the entry
(too tight), or - drop the stop altogether.
This breaks:
- the structural logic from
s-r and
swing-vs-correction, - and leads to a pattern of
“sometimes I survive,
but when I don’t, I lose big.”
6-3. Not updating risk when the account changes
As your account grows or shrinks:
- your 1R in dollars should change too.
Example:
- 10,000 USD account, 1% = 100 USD
- 15,000 USD account, 1% = 150 USD
Some traders keep using the same dollar amount
they started with and slowly drift away
from their stated risk rules.
It helps to regularly recalc:
- “With my current balance,
1R = x% of account = Y USD,”
and then size positions from that.
7. A quick practice exercise
To make this more concrete,
you can try two small tasks.
-
Calculate your current 1R
- “What % of my account
am I truly willing to risk per trade?” - Multiply that by your current balance
and write down 1R
as a number in your account currency.
- “What % of my account
-
Apply the sizing formula to a recent or sample trade
For example:
- Account: 10,000 USD
- 1R: 1% = 100 USD
- BTC long, entry 20,000, stop 19,800
- Stop distance: 200
- Position size: 100 ÷ 200 = 0.5 BTC
Do the same for other coins
and different stop distances
to build intuition.
In short, position sizing is:
taking account-based 1R
and reverse-engineering
how many units you can trade
within that limit.
If you:
- set your R framework with
risk-reward, - define your stop and exit plan from
stop-loss, - and then let this article’s math
decide your size,
you’ll get much more consistent risk control,
even if your chart patterns and strategies stay the same.
In atr-sizing,
we’ll build on this and use ATR
to adjust position size in a more dynamic way.