🐋
āļāļēāļĢāļ‹āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļ‚āļēāļĒāļ§āļēāļŽ

DMI/ADX Basics: Reading Trend Direction and Strength Separately

In this chapter we focus on DMI (Directional Movement Index)
and ADX (Average Directional Index).

Rather than “a crossover means buy/sell,”
we treat them as tools to answer:
“Is the market trending or ranging,
and if trending, in which direction and how strongly?”

Within trend, DMI/ADX acts as:

  • a filter for trend vs range conditions, and
  • in strategy, a way to choose between
    trend-following and range-based approaches.

The diagram below shows:

  • price and ma on top,
  • +DI, -DI, and ADX underneath,

highlighting:

  • which side (+DI or -DI) is in control,
  • when ADX rises into strong-trend territory,
  • and how ADX flattens during choppy ranges.

1. DMI/ADX Structure: +DI, -DI, ADX

DMI/ADX is built from three lines:

  1. +DI (Positive Directional Indicator)

    • measures the size of upward directional movement
      over a recent window,
    • higher values → more genuine upward push.

  2. -DI (Negative Directional Indicator)

    • measures downward directional movement,
    • higher values → more genuine downward push.

  3. ADX (Average Directional Index)

    • distills trend strength only (no direction),
    • high ADX → strong directional movement (up or down),
    • low ADX → likely range or noisy environment.

Key idea:

+DI vs -DI → directional bias
ADX → how trending or non-trending the environment is.

2. Reading Direction with +DI and -DI

2-1. Basic directional bias

Simplest interpretation:

  • +DI > -DI
    → recent action favors upward movement.
  • -DI > +DI
    → recent action favors downward movement.

Combined with:

this helps you see whether:

  • higher highs and higher lows + +DI dominance
    → bullish trend regime,
  • lower highs and lower lows + -DI dominance
    → bearish trend regime.

2-2. +DI/-DI crossovers

Commonly used:

  • +DI crossing above -DI → potential shift toward bullish control,
  • -DI crossing above +DI → potential shift toward bearish control.

On their own, these crossovers are fragile:

  • in ranges, +DI and -DI cross frequently,
  • without ADX and s-r context,
    you tend to get chopped.

Think of DI crossovers as
“directional hints”, not full trading systems.

The diagram below compares:

  • left: a trending environment with stable +DI dominance,
  • right: a choppy range where +DI and -DI
    cross many times without sustained direction.

3. ADX: Trend Strength, Not Direction

ADX is directionless:

  • it rises when price moves directionally (up or down) in a sustained way,
  • it stays low or falls when price is mean-reverting or choppy.

3-1. Typical ADX interpretation

Exact thresholds vary across markets and timeframes, but in practice:

  • very low ADX → environment likely non-trending / range-like,
  • rising ADX from low levels → a trend may be emerging,
  • high ADX rolling over → possible late-trend / exhaustion.

The actual numbers (20, 25, 30, etc.)
should be treated as guidelines, not laws.
It’s worth back-checking on your own market:

“At which ADX levels did real sustained moves
actually occur in the past?”

The diagram below shows:

  • top: price cycling through uptrend → range → downtrend,
  • bottom: ADX rising and staying elevated in trend phases,
    then fading and flattening during the range.

4. Using DMI/ADX as a Trend Filter

In practice, traders often:

  1. use ADX to decide “trend vs range,” then
  2. within that regime, combine +DI/-DI with
    price structure and patterns.

4-1. Example trend filter logic

Conceptually:

  • when ADX is above some threshold and rising,
    you favor trend-following strategies from strategy.
  • when ADX is low and flat or falling,
    you favor range/reversal strategies, such as: double-top-bottom
    and other range-bound setups.

4-2. Combining with direction and entries

Example bullish context:

  • ADX rising,
  • +DI above -DI,
  • price pulling back into support from s-r,
  • with a reversal pattern from candles,

can be read as:

“trend strength returning after a pullback
into a structural support zone.”

Bearish examples are symmetric with -DI dominance,
resistance zones, and bearish patterns.

5. Breakouts, Failures, and DMI/ADX

In chart we discuss:

  • triangles,
  • wedges,
  • double tops/bottoms,
  • head and shoulders,

and other structures that often lead into breakouts.

DMI/ADX helps evaluate whether those breakouts are likely to:

  • carry into a sustained trend, or
  • fizzle into failure type moves.

5-1. Breakouts with “real” strength

Often seen when:

  • a triangle or range breaks,
  • ADX starts to lift from low levels,
  • +DI/-DI clearly favor the breakout direction.

These conditions suggest:

“This is more than a one-bar spike;
a genuine trend leg may be starting.”

5-2. Breakouts without strength

Conversely, if:

  • price pokes above/below a range boundary, s-r
  • ADX remains low and shows no real upturn,
  • DI dominance flips back and forth quickly,

such moves are frequent candidates for
fakeouts or failed breakouts.

6. Common Mistakes with DMI/ADX

  1. Treating ADX levels as hard rules

    • “ADX above 25 = trend, below 25 = no trend”
      is too rigid for real markets.
    • Always sanity-check against historical charts
      on your specific asset and timeframe.

  2. Ignoring price and patterns

    • Trading DMI/ADX in isolation means
      you’re essentially trading an indicator, not the market.
    • Always anchor your view in candles
      and patterns first.

  3. Using DI crossovers as standalone entry signals

    • In ranges, DI lines cross constantly.
    • Without ADX direction and context from
      s-r and patterns,
      you risk overtrading noise.

  4. Applying the same interpretation across all timeframes

    • “High ADX” on a 5-minute chart tells a different story
      than “high ADX” on a daily chart.
    • Tie your interpretation back to
      timeframes and your trading style
      (scalping, swing, position).

7. Practical DMI/ADX Checklist

With DMI/ADX on your chart, ask:

  1. Is ADX low, medium, or high right now?

    • trending or ranging environment?

  2. Is ADX rising, flat, or falling?

    • trend emerging, persisting, or losing steam?

  3. Who is in control, +DI or -DI?

    • and does that align with
      ma and
      your higher-timeframe structure?

  4. Did the latest DI crossover occur near a key level,
    from s-r,
    or in the middle of nowhere?

  5. If I trade based on this information,
    do my stop, target, and size respect
    risk-management?

DMI/ADX works best when used together with:

not as competition but as different lenses:

MA for direction and structure,
MACD for momentum and divergence,
Ichimoku for balance and projected zones,
DMI/ADX for trend strength vs range.

Combine them with price, patterns,
and disciplined risk management—
not as signal machines, but as
structured summaries of market behavior.